News & Record's John Robinson picks up the story in his blog, but gets a little curt in the process:
First, I didn't do it.
Second, if a item is free, is it a crime to take as many as you want? (The question is only half serious. I know that newspaper theft is fully a serious matter as is suppression of the ideas and information in the paper.)
You think ole' JR feels a little salty because the alternative press is doing the work that the N&R should be doing?NAHHHH!
E.C. :)
3 comments:
The YES story was a good one. I do think that the News & Record could have pulled it off, however, it didn't. Could the cutbacks be the reason? Possibly, but I still think the daily paper needs more longer, in-depth stories. Papers like YES and the Rhino can flourish more if they take on the analytical stuff the dailies pass on.
It is arguably a cost of doing business, particularly when you take on sensitive subjects. Doesn't make it right or appropriate, but it's not totally outside of the realm of the expected.
Ben, I agree. Real, thorough, investigative pieces have taken a back seat at the N&R.
Post a Comment